REPEAL, legislation. The abrogation or destruction of a law by a legislative act.
2. A repeal is express; as when it is literally declared by a subsequent law or implied, when the new law contains provisions contrary to or irreconcilable with those of the former law.
3. A law may be repealed by implication, by an affirmative as well as by a negative statute, if the substance is inconsistent with the old statute. 1 Ham. 10: 2 Bibb, 96; Harper, 101; 4 W. C. C. R. 691.
4. It is a general rule that when a penal statute punishes an offence by a certain penalty, and a new statute is passed imposing a greater or a lesser penalty, for the same offence, the former statute is repealed by implication. 5 Pick. 168; 3 Halst. 48; 1 Stew. 506; 3 A. K. Marsh. 70; 21 Pick. 373. See 1 Binn. 601; Bac. Ab. Statute D 7 Mass. 140.
5. By the common law when a statute repeals another, and afterwards the repealing statute is itself repealed, the first is revived. 2 Blackf. 32. In some states this rule has been changed, as in Ohio and Louisiana. Civ. Code of:Louis. art. 23.
6. When a law is repealed, it leaves all the civil rights of the parties acquired under the law unaffected. 3. L. R. 337; 4 L. R. 191; 2 South. 689; Breese, App. 29; 2 Stew. 160.
7. When a penal statute is repealed or so modified as to exempt a class from its operation, violations committed before the repeal are also exempted, unless specifically reserved, or unless there have been some private right divested by it. 2 Dana, 330; 4 Yeates, 392; 1 Stew. 347; 5 Rand. 657; 1 W. C. C. R. 84; 2 Virg. Cas. 382. Vide Abrogation; 18 Vin. Ab. 118.
REPERTORY. This word is nearly synonymous with inventory, and is so called because its contents are arranged in such order as to be easily found. Clef des Lois Rom. h . t.; Merl. Repertoire, h. t.
2. In the French law, this word is used to denote the inventory or minutes which notaries are required tomake of all contracts which take place before them. Dict. de Jur. h. t.
REPETITION, construction of wills. A repetition takes place when the same testator, by the same testamentary instrument, gives to the same legatee legacies of equal amount and of the same kind; in such case the latter is considered a repetition of the former, and the legatee is entitled to one only. For example, a testator gives to a legatee "ô30 a year during his life;" and in another part of the will he gives to the same legatee "an annuity of ô3O for his life payable quarterly," he is entitled to only one annuity of thirty pounds a year. 4 Ves. 79, 90; 1 Bro. C. C. 30, note.
REPETITION, civil law. The act by which a person demands and seeks to recover what he has paid by mistake, or delivered on a condition which has not been performed. Dig. 12, 4, 5. The name of an action which lies to recover the payment which has been made by mistake, when nothing was due.
2. Repetition is never admitted in relation to natural obligations which have been voluntarily acquitted, if the debtor had capacity to give his consent. 6 Toull. n. 386. The same rule obtains in our law. A person who has voluntarily acquitted a natural or even a moral obligation, cannot recover back the money by an action for money had and received, or any other form of action. D. & R. N. P. C. 254; 2 T. R. 763; 7 T. R. 269; 4 Ad. & Ell. 858; 1 P. & D. 253; 2 L. R. 431; Cowp. 290; 3 B. & P. 249, note; 2 East, R. 506; 3 Taunt. R. 311; 5 Taunt. R. 36; Yelv. 41, b, note; 3 Pick. R. 207; 13 John. It. 259.
3. In order to entitle the payer to recover back money paid by mistake it must have been paid by him to a person to whom he did not owe it, for otherwise he cannot recover it back, the creditor having in such case the just right to retain the money. Repetitio nulla est ab eo qui suum recepit.
4. How far money paid under a mistake of law is liable to repetition, has been discussed by civilians, and opinions on this subject are divided. 2 Poth. Ob. by Evans, 369, 408 to 487; 1 Story, Eq. Pl. 111, note 2.
REPETITION, Scotch law. The act of reading over a witness deposition, in order that he may adhere to it, or correct it at his choice. The same as Recolement, (q. v.) in the French law. 2 Benth. on Ev. B. 3, c. 12, p. 239.
REPLEADER, practice. When an immaterial issue has been formed, the court will order the parties to plead de novo, for the purpose of obtaining a better issue this is called a repleader.
2. In such case, they must begin to replead at the first fault. If the declaration, plea and replication be all bad, the parties must begin de novo, if the plea and replication be both bad and a repleader is awarded, it must be as to both; but if the declaration and plea be good, and the replication only bad, the parties replead from the replication only.
3. In order to elucidate this point, it may be proper to give an instance, where the court awarded a repleader for a fault in the plea, which is the most ordinary cause of a repleader. An action was brought against hushand and wife, for a wrong done by the wife alone, before the marriage, and both pleaded that they were not guilty of the wrong imputed to them, which was held to be bad, because there was no wrong alleged to have been committed by the hushand, and therefore a repleader was awarded, and the plea made that the wife only was not guilty. Cro. Jac. 5. See other instances in: Hob. 113: 5 Taunt. 386.
4. The following rules as to repleaders were laid down in the case of Staples v. Haydon, 2 Salk. 579. First. That at common law, a repleader was allowed before trial, because a verdict did not cure an immaterial issue, but now a repleader ought not to be allowed till after trial, in any case when the fault of the issue might be helped by the verdict, or by the statute of jeofails. Second. That if a repleader be allowed where it ought not to be granted, or vice versa, it is error. Third. That the judgment of repleader is general, quod partes replacitent, and the parties must begin at the first fault, which occasioned the immaterial issue. Fourth. No costs are allowed on either side. Fifth. That a repleader cannot be awarded after a default at nisi prius; to which may be added, that in general a repleader cannot be awarded after a demurrer or writ of error, without the consent of the parties, but only after issue joined; where however, there is a bad bar, and a bad replication, it is said that a repleader may be awarded upon a demurrer; a repleader will not be awarded where the court can give judgment on the whole record, and it is not grantable in favor of the person who made the first fault in pleading. See Com. Dig. Pleader, R 18; Bac. Abr. Pleas, M; 2 Saund. 319 b, n. 6; 2 Vent. 196; 2 Str. 847; 5 Taunt. 386; 8 Taunt. 413; 2 Saund. 20; 1 Chit. Pl. 632; Steph. pl. 119; Lawes, Civ. Pl. 175.
5. The difference between a repleader and a judgment non obstante veredicto, is this; that when a plea is good in form, though not in fact, or in other words, if it contain a defective title or ground of defence by which it is apparent to the court, upon the defendant's own showing, that in any way of putting it, he can have no merits, and the issue joined thereon be found for him there, as the awarding of a repleader could not mend the case, the court for the sake of the plaintiff will at once give judgment non obstante veredicto; but where the defect is not so much in the title as in the manner of stating it, and the issue joined thereon is immaterial, so that the court know not for whom to give judgment, whether for the plaintiff or defendant, there for their own sake they will award a repleader; a judgment, therefore, non obstante veredicto, is always upon the merits, and never granted but in a very clear case; a repleader is upon the form and manner of pleading. Tidd's Pr. 813, 814; Com. Dig. Pleader, R 18 Bac. Abr. Pleas, M; 18 Vin. Ab. 567; 2 Saund. 20; Doct. Plac. h. t.; Arch. Civ. Pl. 258; 1 Chit. Pl. 632; U. S. Dig. XII.
REPLEGIARE, To redeem a thing detained or taken by another, by putting in legal sureties. See Replevin.
REPLEVIN, remedies. The name of an action for the recovery of goods and chattels.
2. It will be proper to consider, 1. For what property this action will lie. 2. What interest the plaintiff must have in the same. 3. For what injury. 4. The pleadings. 5. The judgment.
3. - 1. To support replevin, the property affected must be a personal chattel, and not an injury to the freehold, or to any matter which is annexed to it; 4 T. R. 504; nor for anything which has been turned into a chattel by having been separated from it by the defendant, and carried away at one and the same time; 2 Watts, R. 126; 3 S. & R. 509 6 S. & R. 4761; 10 S. & R. 114; 6 Greenl. R. 427; nor for writings which concern the realty. 1 Brownl. 168.
4. The chattel also must possess indicia or ear-marks, by which it may be distinguished from all others of the same description; otherwise the plaintiff would be demanding of the law what it has not in its power to bestow; replevin for loose money cannot, therefore, be maintained; but it may be supported for money tied up in a bag, and taken in that state from the plaintiff. 2 Mod. R. 61. Vide 1 Dall. 157; 6 Binn. 2; 3 Serg. & Rawle, 562; 2 P. A. Browne's R. 160; Addis. R. 134; 10 Serg. & Rawle, 114; 4 Dall. Appx. i.; 2 Watt's R. 126; 2 Rawle's R. 423.
5. - 2. The plaintiff, at the time of the caption, must have been possessed, or, which amounts to the same thing, have had an absolute property in and be entitled to the possession of the chattel, or it could not have been taken from him. He must, in other words, have had a general property, or a special property, as the bailee of the goods. His right to the possession must also be continued down to the time of judgment pronounced, otherwise he has no claim to the restoration of the property. Co. Litt. 145, b. It has however, been doubted whether on a more naked tailment for safe keeping, the bailee can maintain replevin. 1 John. R. 380; 3 Serg. & Rawle, 20.
6. - 3. This action lies to recover any goods which have been illegally taken. 7 John R. 140; 5 Mass. R. 283; 14 John. R. 87; 1 Dall. R. 157; 6 Binn. R. 2; 3 Serg. & Rawle, 562; Addis. R. 134; 1 Mason, 319; 2 Fairf. 28. The primary object of this action, is to recover back the chattel itself, and damages for taking and detaining it are consequent on the recovery. 1 W. & S. 513; 20 Wend. 172; 3 Shepl. 20. When the properly has been restored this action cannot, therefore, be maintained. But the chattel is considered as detained, not-withstanding the defendant may have destroyed it before the suit was commenced; for he cannot take advantage of his own wrong.
7. - 4. This being a local action, the declaration requires certainty in the description of the place where the distress was taken. 2 Chit: Pl. 411, 412; 10 John. R. 53. But it has been held in Pennsylvania, that the declaration is sufficient, if the taking is laid to be in the county. 1 P. A. Browne's Rep. 60. The strictness which formerly prevailed on this subject, has been relaxed. 2 Saund. 74, b. When the distress has been taken for rent, the defendant usually avows or makes cognizance, in order to obtain a return of the goods to which avowry or cognizance the plaintiff pleads in bar, or the defendant may, in proper cases, plead non cepit, cepit in alio loco, guilty. 1 Chit. Pl. 490, 491.
8. - 5. As to the judgment, Vide article Judgment in Replevin. Vide, gen-erally, Bac. Ab. h. t.; 1 Saund. 347, n. 1; 2 Sell. Pr. 153; Doct. Pl. 414; Com. Dig. h. t.; Dane's Ab. h. t.; Petersd. Ab. h. t.; 18 Vin. Ab. 576; Yelv. 146, a; 1 Chit., Pl. 157; Ham. N. P. ch. 3, p. 372 to 498; Amer. Dig. h. t.; Harr. Dig. h. t.; Bouv. Inst. Index, h. t. As to the evidence required in replevin, see Roscoe's Civ. Ev. 353. Vide, also, article Detinuit.
REPLEVY. To re-deliver goods which have been distrained to the original possessor of them, on his giving pledges in all action of replevin. It signifies also the bailing or liberating a man from prison, on his finding bail to answer. See Replevin.
REPLIANT. One who makes a replication.
REPLICATION, pleading. The plaintiff's answer to the defendant's plea.
2. Replications will be considered, 1. With regard to their several kinds. 2. To their form. 3. To their qualities.
3. - 1. They are to pleas in abatement and to pleas in bar.
4. - 1. When the defendant pleads to the jurisdiction of the court, the plaintiff may reply, and in this case the replication commences with a statement that the writ ought not to be quashed, or that the court ought not to be ousted of their jurisdiction, because &c., and concludes to the country, if the replication merely deny the subject-matter of the plea. Rast. Entr. 101 Thomps. Entr. 2; Clift's Entr. 17; 1 Chit. Pl. 434. As a general rule, when the plea is to the misnomer of the plaintiff or defendant, or when the plea consists of matter of fact which the plaintiff denies, the replication may begin without any allegation that the writ or bill ought not to be quashed. 1 Bos. & Pull. 61.
5. - 2. The replication is, in general, governed by the plea, and most frequently denies it. When the plea concludes to the country, the plaintiff must, in general, reply by adding a similiter; but when the plea concludes with a verification, the replication must either, 1. Conclude the defendant by matter of estoppel; or, 2. May deny the truth of the matter alleged in the plea, either in whole or in part; or, 3. May confess and avoid the plea; or, 4. In the case of an evasive plea, may new assign the cause of action. For the several kinds of replication as they relate to the different forms of action, see 1 Chit. Pl. 551, et seq.; Arch. Civ. Pl. 258.
6. - 2. The form of the replication will be considered with regard to, 1. The title. 2. The commencement. 3. The body. 4. The conclusion.
7. - 1. The replication is usually entitled in the court and of the term of which it is pleaded, and the names of the plaintiff and defendant are stated in the margin, thus "A B against C D." 2 Chit. Pl. 641.
8. - 2. The commencement is that part of the replication which immediately follows the statement of the title of the court and term, and the names of the parties. It varies in form when it replies to matter of estoppel from what it does when it denies, or confesses and avoids the plea; in the latter case it commences with an allegation technically termed the preclude non. (q. v.) It generally commences with the words, "And the said plaintiff saith that the said defendant," &c. 1 Chit. Pl. 573.
9. - 3. The body of the replication ought to contain either. 1. Matter of estoppel. 2. Denial of the plea. 3. A confession and avoidance of it; or, 4. In case of an evasive plea, a new assignment. 1st. When the matter of estoppel does not appear from the anterior pleading, the replication should set it forth; as, if the matter has been tried upon a particular issue in trespass, and found by the jury, such finding may be replied as an estoppel. 3 East, R. 346; vide 4 Mass. R. 443. 2d. The second kind of replication is that which denies or traverses the truth of the plea, either in part or in whole. Vide Traverse, and 1 Chit. Pl. 576, note a. 3d. The third kind of replication admits, either in words or in effect, the fact alleged in the plea, and avoids the effect of it by stating new matter. If, for example, infancy be pleaded, the plaintiff may reply that the goods were necessaries, or that the defen-dant, after he came of full age, ratified and confirmed the promise. Vide Confession and Avoidance. 4th. When the plea is such as merely to evade the allegation in the declaration, the plaintiff in his replication may reassign it. Vide New Assignment, and 1 Chit. Pl. 601.
10. - 4. With regard to the conclusion, it is a general rule, that when the replication denies the whole of the defendant's plea, containing matter of fact, it should conclude to the country. There are other conclusions in particular cases, which the reader will find fully stated in 1 Chit. Pl. 615, et seq.; Com. Dig. Pleader, F 5 vide 1 Saund. 103, n.; 2 Caines' R. 60 2 John. R. 428; 1 John. R. 516; Arcb. Civ. Pl. 258; 19 Vin. Ab 29; Bac. Ab. Trespass, I 4; Doct. Pl. 428; Beames' Pl. in Eq. 247, 325, 326.
11. - 3. The qualities of a replication are, 1. That it must answer so much of the defendant's plea as it professes to answer, and that if it be bad in part, it is bad for the whole. Com. Dig. Pleader, F 4, W 2; 1 Saund. 338; 7 Cranch's Rep. 156. 2. It must not depart from the allegations in the declaration in any material matter. Vide Departure, and 2 Saund . 84 a, note 1; Co. Lit. 304 a. See also 3 John. Rep. 367; 10 John. R. 259; 14 John., R. 132; 2 Caines' R. 320. 3. It must be certain. Vide Certainty. 4. It must be single. Vide U. S. Dig. Pleading, XI.; Bouv. Inst. Index, h. t.; Duplicity; Pleadings.
REPORT, legislation. A statement made by a committee to a legislative assembly, of facts of which they were charged to inquire.
REPORT, practice. A certificate to the court made by a master in chancery, commissioner or other person appointed by the court, of the facts or matters to be ascertained by him, or of something of which it is his duty to inform the court.
2. If the parties in the case accede to the report, find no exceptions are filed, it is in due time confirmed; if exceptions are filed to the report, they will, agreeably to the rules of the court, be heard, and the report will either be confirmed, set aside, or referred. back for the correction of some error. 2 Madd. Ch. 505; Blake's Ch. Pr. 230; Vin. Ab. h. t.
REPORTER. A person employed in making out and publishing the history of cases decided by the court.
2. The act of congress of August 26, 1842, sect., 2, enacts, that in the supreme court of the United States, one reporter shall be appointed by the court with the salary of twelve hundred and fifty dollars; provided that he deliver to the secretary of state for distribution, one hundred and fifty copies of each volume of reports that he shall hereafter prepare and publish, immediately after the publication thereof, which publication shall be made annually within four months after the adjournment of the court at which the decisions are made.
3. In some of the states the reporters are appointed by authority of law; in others, they are volunteers.
REPORTS. Law books, containing a statement of the facts and law of each case which has been decided by the courts; they are generally the most certain proof of the judicial decisions of the courts, and contain the most satisfactory evidence, and the most authoritative and precise application of the rules of the common law. Lit. s. 514; Co. Lit. 293 a; 4 Co. Pref.; 1 Bl. Com. 71 Ram. on Judgm. ch. 13.
2. The number of reports has increased to an inconvenient extent, and should they multiply in the same ratio which of late they have done, they will so soon crowd our libraries as to become a serious evil. The indiscriminate re-port of cases of every description is deserving of censure. Cases where first principles are declared to be the law, are reported with as much care as those where the most abstruse questions are decided. But this is not all; sometimes two reporters, with the true spirit of book-making, report the same set of cases, and thereby not only unnecessarily increase the lawyer's already encumbered library, but create confusion by the discrepancies which occasionally appear in the report of the same case.
3. The modern reports are too often very diffuse and inaccurate. They seem too frequently made up for the purpose of profit and sale, much of the matter they contain being either useless or a mere repetition, while they are deficient in stating what is really important.
4. A report ought to contain, 1. The name of the case. 2. The court in which it originated; and, when it has been taken to another by appeal, certiorari, or writ of error, it ought to mention by whom it was so taken, and by what proceeding. 3. The state of the facts, including the pleadings, as far as requisite. 4. The true point before the court. 5. The manner in which that point has been determined, and by whom. 6. The date.
5. The following is believed to be a correct list of the American and English Reports; the former arranged under the heads of the respective states; and the latter in chronological order. It is hoped this list will be useful to the student.
Dallas' Reports. From August term, 1790, to August term, 1800. 4 vols. Cranch's Reports. From 1800 to February term, 1815. 9 vols. Wheaton's Reports. From February term, 181 to January term, 1827, inclusive. 12 vols.
Peters' Reports. 16 vols. Peters' Condensed Reports of Supreme Court of the United States. These volumes contain condensed reports of all the cases in second, third, and fourth Dallas, the nine volumes of Cranch, and the twelve volumes of Wheaton.
Howard's Reports. From 1843 to 1852. 11 vols.
Gallison's Reports. From 1812 to 1815, inclusive. 2 vols. Mason's Reports. From 1816 to 1830, inclusive. 5 vols. Sumner's Reports. From 1830 t. 1837. 2 vol. Story's Reports. From 1839 to l845. 3 vols. Woodbury and Minot's Reports. From 1845 to 1847. 2 vols.
Paine's Reports. From 1810 to 1826. 1 vol.
Dallas' Reports. The second, third and fourth volumes contain cases decided in this court. From Washington's C. C. Reports. From 1803 to 1827. 4 vols. Peters' C. C. Reports. From 1803 to 1818. 1 vol. Baldwin's Reports. From Oct. term, 1829, to April term 1833 inclusive. 1 vol. Wallace's Reports. Include the cases of May Sessions, 1801. 1 vol. Wallace, Jr's. Reports. 1 vol.
Marshall's Decisions. From 1802 to 1832, published since the death of Chief Justice Marshall, from his manuscripts, by John M. Brockenbrough. 2 vols.
Van Ness' Reports. I vol.
Peters' Admiralty Decisions. From 1792 to 1807. 2 vols.
Gilpin's Reports. From Nov. term, 1828, to Feb. term, 1836, inclusive. 1 vol.
Bee's Admiralty Reports. From 1792 to 1805. 1 vol.
Reports of cases argued and determined in the District Court of the United States, for the District of Maine, from 1822 to 1839. 1 vol. Cited Ware's Reports.
Alabama Reports. By Henry Minor. From 1820 to 1826. 1 vol. Stewart's Reports. From 1827 to 1831. 3 vols. Stewart & Porter's Reports. From 1831 to 1833. 5 vols. Porter's Reports. From 1834 to 1839. 9 vols. Alabama Reports. From 1840 to 1849. 14 vols.
Pike's Reports. From 1837 to 1842. 5 vols.
Kirby's Reports,. From 1785 to 1788. 1 vol. Root's Reports. From 1799 to 1798. 2 vols. Day's Reports, From 1802 to 1813. 5 vols. Connecticut Reports. By Thomas Day. From June, 1814 to 1847. 18 vols.
Harrington's Reports. From 1832 to 1847. 4 vols.
Florida Reports. From 1846 to 1847. 2 vols.
T. U. P. Chariton's Reports. A Cases decided previous to 1810. 1 vol. Dudley's Reports. From 1831 to 1833. 1 vol. R. M. Charlton's Reports. From 1811 to 1837. 1 vol. Kelly's Reports, 3 vols. Georgia Reports. From 1846 to 1849. 6 vols.
Breese's Reports. From 1819 to 1830. 1 vol. Scammond's Reports. From 1832 to 1843. 4 vols. Gilman's Reports. From 1844 to 1847. 4 vols.
Blackford's Reports. From May, 1817, to May, 1838, inclusive, 7 vols.
Green's Reports. 1 vol.
Hughes' Reports. From 1785 to 1801. 1 vol. Kentucky Decisions. From 1801 to 1806. 1 vol. Hardin's Reports. Fr@m 1805 to 1806. 1 vol. Bibb's Reports. From 1808 to 1817. 4 vols. A. K. Marshall's Reports. From 1817 to 1821 3 vols. Littells Reports. From 1822 to 1824. 6 vols. Littells Select Cases. From 1795 to 1821. 1 vol. Munro's Reports. From 1824 to 1828. 7 vols J. S. Marshall's Reports. From 1829 to 1832 7 vols. Dana's Reports. From 1833 to 1840. 9 vols. B. Monroe's Reports. From 1840 to 1848. 8 vols.
Orleans Term Reports. By Martin. From 1809 to 1812. 2 vols in 1. Louisiana Term Reports. By Martin, From 1812 to 1823. 10 vols. Martin's Reports, N. S. (sometimes cited simply New Series,) 1823 to 1830. 8 vols. The whole of Martin's Reports amount to twenty volumes; the first twelve, namely, the Orleans and the Louisiana Term Reports, are cited as Martin's Reports; from the twelfth, they are sometimes cited as first, second, &c., Martin's New Series, and sometimes simply New Series. Louisiana Reports. 19 vols. The first five volumes, from 1830 to August term, 1834, and the first part of the sixth volume, are the work of Branch W. Miller. The remainder were reported by Mr. Currey, and are continued to June term, 1839. The whole of the 19 volumes are cited Louisiana Reports. Robinson's Reports. From 1841 to 1843. 12 vols.
By a resolve of the legislature, passed in 1836, each volume subsequent to the third volume of Fairfield's Reports, shall be entitled and lettered upon the back thereof, "Maine Reports;" and the first volume subsequent to the third volume of Fairfield's shall be numbered the thirteenth Volume of Maine Reports. Maine Reports. 26 vols. These reports consist of Greenleaf's Reports. From 1820 to 1832. The first 9 vols.
Fairfield's Reports. From 1833 to 1835. The 10th, 11th, and 12th vols. Shepley's Reports. From 1836 to 18401. The 13th to 18th vols., inclusive. 6 vols. Appleton's Reports. The 19th vol. 2 vols. Appleton, part of vol. 20. Shepley's Reports, part of vol. 20 and vol. 21 to 28, inclusive. From 1841 to 1846. 8 vols.
Harris & McHenry's Reports. From 1709 to 1799. 4 vols. Sometimes cited Maryland Reports. Harris & Johnson. From 1800 to 1826. 7 vols. Harris & Gill. From 1826 to 1829. 2 vols. Gill & Johnson. From 1829 to 1840. 12 vols. Bland's Chancery Reports. From 1811 to 1832. 3 vols. Gill's Reports. From 1813 to 1849. 5 vols.
Massachusetts Reports. The first volume is reported by Ephraim Williams. His reports commenced with September term, 1804, in Berkshire, and terminate with June term, 1805, in Hancock. The 16 volumes from the second to the seventeenth, inclusive, are reported by Dudley Alkins Tyng, and embrace from March term, 1806, in Suffolk, to March term, 1822, in Suffolk. The reports of Williams and Tyng are cited Massachusetts Reparts. Pickering's Reports. From 1832 to March 1840. 24 vols. Metcalf's Reports. From 1840 to 1848. 1 vols.
Harrington's Reports. 1 vol. Walker's Chancery Cases. From 1842 to 1845. 1 vol. Douglass' Reports. From 1843 to 1847. 2 vols.
Walker's Reports. From 1818 to 1832. 1 vol. Howard's Reports. From 1834 to 1843. 7 vols. Smedes & Marshall's Reports. From 1843 to 1849. 12 vols. Freeman's Chancery Reports. From 1839 to 1843. 1 vol. Smedes & Marshall's Chancery Reports. From 1840 to 1843. 1 vol.
Missouri Reports. From 1821 to 1846. 9 vols.
New Hampshire Reports. From 1816 to 1842. 13 vols. Nathaniel Adams reported cases from 1816 to 1819, which makes the first volume of N. H. Rep. Levi Woodbury and William Richardson reported the cases from 1819, to 1823; and William Richardson from 1823 to 1832, making the third fourth and fifth volumes of N. H. Rep. They are continued under the direction of the supreme court, and already make thirteen volumes.
Coxes' Reports. From 1790 to 1795. 1 vol. Pennington's Reports. From 1806 to 1813. 2 vols. Southard's Reports. From 1816 to 1820. 2 vols. Halstead's Reports. From 1821 to 1831. 7 vols. Green's Reports. From 183@ to 1836. 3 vols. Harrison's Reports. From 1837 to 1842. 4 vols. Sexton's Chancery Reports. From 1830 to 1832. 1 vol. Green's Chancery Reports, 1838 to 1846. 3 vols. Spencer's Reports. From 1842 to 1845. 1 vol. Halsted's Chancery Reports. From 1845 to 1846. 1 vol.
Coleman & Caine's Cases. From 1794 to 1805. 1 vol. Caine's Reports. From 180,3 to 1805. 3 vols. Caine's Cases. For 1804 and 1805. 2 vols. Anthon's Nisi Prias Cases. From 1808 to 1818. 1 vol. Roger's New York City Hall Recorder. From 1816 to 1821. 6 vols. Wheeler's Criminal Cases. 3 vols. Hall's Reports. For 1828 and 1829. 2 vols. Hoffman's Vice Chancery Reports. From 1839 to 1840. 1 vol. Edwards' Vice Chancery Reports. From 1831 to 1842. 3 vols. Clarke's Vice Chancery Reports. From 1839 to 1841., 1 vol. Johnson's Cases. From 1799 to 1803. 3 vols. Johnson's Repoets. From 1806 to 1823. 20 vols. Cowen's Reports. From 1823 to 1828. 9 vols, Wendell's Reporti. From 1828 to 1841. 26 vols. Hill's Reports from 1841 to 1845. 7 vols. John ns &a cery Reparts. From 1814 to 1823. 7 vols. Howard's Practice Reports. For 1844 and 1845. 3 vols. Denio's Reports. From 1845 to 1847. 5 vols. Hopkin's Chancery Reports. From 1823 to 1826. 1 vol. Paige's Chancery Reports. From 1828 to 1845. 11 vols. Sandford's Vice Chancery Reports. From 1843 to 1846. 3 vols. Barbour's Chancery Reports. From 1845 to 1849. 3 vols. Barbour's Superior Court. For 1847 and 1848. 4 vols. Sandford's Superior Court. For 1847 and 1848. 1 vol. Lockwood's Reversed Cases. From 1799 to 1847. 1 vol. Comstock's Supreme Court. For 1847 and 1848. 1 vol.
Martin's Reports. 1 vol. Heywood's Reports. From 1789 to 1806. 2 vols. Taylor's Reports. From 1789 to 1802. 1 vol. North Carolina Term Reports, (sometimes bound and lettered are cited as the third Law Repository.) It is a second volume of Reports by John Louis Taylor; it contains cases from 1816 to 1818. 1 vol. Conference Reports. By Cameron & Norwood. From 1800 to 1804. 1 vol. Murphy's Reports. From 1804 to 1819. 3 vols. Carolina Law Repository. From 1813 to 1816. 2 vols. Hawks' Reports. From 1820 to 1826. 4 vols. Ruin's Reports, (bound with Hawks' Reports.) Devereux's Reports. From 1826 to 1834. 4 vols. Devereux's Equity Reports. From 1826 to 1834. 2 vols. Devereux & Battle's Reports. From 1834 to 1840. 4 vols. Deveretlx & Battle's Equity Reports. From 1834 to 1840. 2 vols. Iredell's Reports, Law. From 1840 to 1849. 9 vols. Iredell's Reports, Chancery. From 1840 to 1848, 5 vols.
Ohio Reports. 15 vols. These reports are composed of Hammond's Reports. From 1821 to 1839. 9 vols. Wright's Reports. From 1831 to 1834. 1 vol. Wilcox's Reports. From 1840 to 1841. 1 vol. Stanton's Reports. From 1841 to 1843. 3 vols. Griswold's Reports. From 1844 to 1846. 2 vols.
Dallas' Reports. From 1754 to 1806. 4 vols. Vide Supra. Yeates' Reports. From 1791 to 1808. 4 vols. Binney's Reports. From 1799 to 1814. 6 vols Sergeant & Rawle's Reports. From 1818 to 1829. 17 vols Rawle's Reports. trom 1828 to 1835. 5 vols. Wharton's Reports. From 1835 to 1841. 6 vols. Pennsylvania Reports, reported by William Rawle, Charles B. Penrose, and Frederick Watts. From 1829 to 1832. 3 vols. Watts' Reports. From 1832 to 1840. 10 vols. Watts & Sergeant's Reports. 9 vols. Browne's Reports. From 1806 to 1814. 2 vols. Miles' Reports. For 1835 and 1841. 2 vols. Addison's Reports. From 1791 to 1799. 1 vol. Ashmead's Reports. From 1808 to 1841. 2 vols. Pennsylvania State Reports. By Robert M. Barr. From 1844 to 1849. 10 vols. 1849 to 1850. 2 vol. By J. Pringle Jones. 1830 to 1852. 4 vols. By Geo. W. Harris.
Bay's Reports. From 1783 to 1804. 2 vols. Dessaussure's Equity Reports. From the Revolution to 1813. 4 vols. Brevard's Reports. From 1793 to 1816. 3 vols. South Carolina Reports. From 1812 to 1816. 2 vols. Nott & M'Cord's Reports. From 1817 to 1820. 2 vols. Mills' Constitutional Reports, N. S. For 1817 and 1818. 2 vols. Harper's Reports. For 1823 and 1824. 1 vol. Harper's Equity Reports. For 1824. 1 vol. M'Cord's Reports. From 1820 to 1829. 4 vols. M'Cord's Chancery Reports. From 1825 to 1827. 2 vols. Bailey's Reports. From 1828 to 1832. 2 vols. Bailey's Cbancery. From 1830 to 1831. 1 vol. Hill's Reports. From 1833 to 1837. 3 vols. Hill's Chancery Reports. For 1838. 2 vols. Riley's Chancery Cases. From 1836 to 1887. 1 vol Riley's Law Cases. From 1836 to 1837. 1 vol. Dudley's Law Reports. From 1837 to 1838 1 vol. Dudley's Equity Reports. From 1837 to 1838 1 vol. Rice's Reports. Frlom 1838 to 1839. 1 vol. Rice's Chancery Reports. From 1838 to 1839. 1 vol. Cheves' Reports. From 1839 to 1840. 2 vols. McMullan's Chancery. From 1840 to 1842. 1 vol. McMullen's Law. FTOM 1835 to 1842. 2 vols. Spear's Equity. From 1842 to 1844. 1 vol. Spear's Law. For 1843. 2 vols. Richardson's Law Reports. From 1844 to 1847. 3 vols. Richardson's Equity Reports. From 1844 to 1846. 2 vols. Strobhart's Law Reports. From 1846 to 1848. 3 vols. Strobhart's Equity Reports. From 1846 to 1848. 2 vols. Statutes at Large, For 1838. 9 vols.
Tennessee Reports. From 179i to 1815. 2 vols. These cases were reported by John Overton. They are cited Tenn. Rep. Cooke's Reports. From 1811 to 1814. 1 vol. Heywood's Reports. From 1816 to 1818. 3 vols. These volumes are numbered three, four, and five, in a series with Judge Heywood's North Carolina Reports, volumes one and two. Peck's Reports. From 1822 to 1824. 1 vol. Martin & Yerger's Reports. From 1825 to 1828. 1 vol. Yerger's Reports. From 1832 to 1837. 10 vols. Meigs' Reports. From 1838 to 1839. 1 vol. Humphrey's Reports. From 1839 to 1846. 8 vols.
N. Chipman's Reports. From 1789 to 1791. 1 vol. Tyler's Reports. From 1801 to 1803. 2 vols Brayton's Reports. From 1815 to 1819. 1 vol. D. Chipman's Reports. Containing Select Cases from N. Chipman's Reports, and cages down to 1825. 2 vols. Aiken's Reports. For 1826 and 1827. 2 vols. Vermont Reports. From 1826 to 1846. 18 vols. These reports are composed of Judges Reports, the first 9 vols. Shaw's Reports. The 10th and part of the 11th vol. Watson's Reports. Part of 11th, the whole of 12th, 13th, and 14th vols. Slade's Reports. The 15th vol. Washburne's Reports. The 16th, 17th, and 18th vols.
Wythe's Chancery Reports. From 1790 to 1795. 1 vol. Washington's Reports. From 1790 to 1796. 2 vols. Call's Reports. From 1790 to 1818. 6 vols. Henning and Mumford's Reports. From 1806 to 1809. 4 vols. Mumford's Reports. From 1810 to 1820. 6 vols. I Gilmer's Reports, (sometimes cited Virginia Reports.) During 1820 and 1821. 1 vol. Randolph's Reports. From 1821 to 1828. 6 vols. Leigh's Reports. From 1829 to 1841. 12 vols. Jefferson's Reports. From 1730 to 1772. 1 vol. Virginia cases. From 1789 to 1826. 2 vols. The first of these volumes is by Judges Brockenbrough and Holmes, and contains cases decided from 1789 to 1814; the second volume is by Judge Brockenbrough, and contains cases decided from 1815 to 1826. Robinson's Reports. From 1842 to 1844. 2 vols. Grattan's Reports. From 1844 to 1848. 5 vols.
Burritt's Reports. 1 Vol.
6. The following is a chronological list of English and Irirh contemporary Reports, alphabetically arranged under each reign.
Henry III. Oct. 19, 1216. Nov. 16, 1272. Jenkins, Ex., 4, 19, 21.Edward I. Nov. 16, 1272. July 7, 1307. Jenkins, Ex., 18, 34. Keilwey, K. B. and C. P., 6. Year Book, K. B., C. P. and Exchequer, part 1.
Edward II. July 7, 1307. Jan. 25, 1327. Jenkins, Ex., 5, 15, 18. Year Book, K. B., C. P;, and Ex., part I.
Edward III. Jan. 25, 1327., June 21, 1377. Benloe, K. B. and C. P., 32. Jenkins, Ex., I to 47. Keilwey, K. B. and C. P. 1 to 47. Year Book' K. B. and C. P., part 2-1 to 10. Year Book: K. B. and C. P., P.,t 3-17, 18, 21 to 28, 38, 89. Year Book, K. B. and C. P., part 4-40 to 50. Year Book, part 5, Liber Assisarum, 1 to 51.
Richard II. June 21, 1377. Sept. 29, 1399. Bellewe, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 22. Jenkins, Ex., I to 22.
Henry IV. Sept. 29, 1399. Mar. 20, 1413. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 14. Year Book, K. B. and C. P., part 6, 1 to 14.
Henry V. Mar. 20, 1413. Aug. 31, 1422. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 10. Year Book, K. B. and C. P., part 6 - 1, 2, 5, 7 to 10.
Henry VI. Aug. 31, 1422. Mar. 4, 1461. Benloe, K. B. and C. P., 2, 18. Jenkins, Ex., I to 39. Year Book, K. B. and C. P., parts 7 and 8 - 4, 7 to 12, 14, 18 to 22, 27, 28, 30 to 39.
Edward IV. Mar. 4, 1461. April 9, 1483. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 21. Year Book, K. B. and C. P., part 9 - 1 to 22. Year Book, K. B., C. P., and Ex., part 10-5.
Edward V. April 9, 1483. June 22, 1483. Jenkins, Ex. Year Book, X. B. and C. P., part 11.
Richard III. June 22, 1483., Aug. 22, 1485. Jenkins, Ex., 1, 2. 1 Year Book, K. B. and C. P., part 11 - 1, 2.
Henry VII. Aug. 22, 1485. April 22, 1509. Benloe, K. B. and C. P. 1. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 21. Keilwey, K. B. and C. P.; 12, 13, 17 to 24. Moore, K. B. and C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 2 Year Book, K. B, and C. P., part 11 - 1 to 16, 20 to 24.
Henry VIII. April 22, 1509. Jan. 28, 1547. Anderson, C. P., 25, &c. Benloe, C. P., 1 to 38. Benloe, (New), K. B., C. P., and Ex., 22, &c Benloe, Keilwey and Ashe, K. B., C. P and Ex. Brooke's New Cases, K. B., C. P., and Exchequer. Dalison, C. P., 38. Dyer, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan. 4, &c. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 38. Keilwey, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 11, and 21. Moore, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 3. Year Book, K. B., and C. P., part 11-13, 14, 18, 19, 26, 27, 29 to 38.
Edward VI. Jan, 28, 1547. July 6, 1553. Anderson, C. P., 1 to 6. Benloe and Dalison, C. P., 2, Brooke's New Cases, K. B., C. P. and Ex. Benloe (New), K. B., C. P. and Ex. 1 to 6. Dyer, K. B., C. P.; Ex. and Chan. 1 to 6. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 6. Moore, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 6. Plowden, K. B., C. P. and Exchequer, 4 to 6.
Mary. - July 6, 1553. Nov. 17, 1558. Anderson, C. P., 1 to 6. Benloe and Dalison, C P., 1 to 5. Benloe in Keilwey and Ashe, K. B., C. P. a Ex., 1 to 5. Benloe (New), K. B., C. P. and Ex., 1 to 5. Booke's New Cases, K. B., C. P., and Ex., 1 to 5. Cary, Chan., 5. Dyer, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 5. Dalison, in Keilwey and Ashe, C. P., 1, 4, 5. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 5. Leonard, K. B., C. P., and Ex., 1 to 5. Owen, K. B. and C. P., 4, 5. Plowden, K. B., C. P. and Ex., I to 5.
Elizabeth. Nov. 17, 1558. Mar. 24, 1603. Anderson, C. P., 1 to 45. Benloe in Keilwey and Ashe, K. B., C. P., and Ex., 2 to 20. Benloe, K. B., C. P., and Ex., 1 to 17. Benloe, C. P., 1 to 21. Brownlow and Goldeshorough, C. P., 11 to 45. Cary, Chan., 1 to 45. Coke, K. B , C. P., Ex. and Chan., 14 to 45. Croke, K. B., and C. P., 24 to 45. Dalison, C. P., 1 to 16. Dalison in Keilwey and Ashe, C. P., 2 to 7. Dickens, Chan., a few cases. Dyer, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 23. Godbolt, K. B., &c., 17 to 45. Goldeshorough, K. B., &c., 28 to 31, 39 to 43. Hobart, K. B., &c., a few cases. Hutton, C. P., 26 to 38. Jenkins, Ex., I to 45. Leonard, K. B., C. P. and Ex., 1 to 45. Moore, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan. 1 to 45. Noy. K. B. and C. P., 1 to 45. Owen, K. B. and C. P., I to 45. Plowden, K. B., C. P. and Ex. Popham, K. B., C. P. and Chan., 34, 9 Savill e, C. P. and Ex., 22 to 36. Tothill, Chan., 1 to 45. YelveKton, K. B. 44, 45.
James I. Mar. 24, 1603. Mar. 27, 1625. Anderson, C. P., 1. Benloe, K. B., C. P., and Ex., 19 to 23. Bridgman, C. P , 12 to 19. Brownlow and Goldeshorough, C. P., 1 to 23. Bulstrode, K. B., 7 to 15. Cary, Chan. 1. Coke, K. B., C. P, Ex. and Chan., 1 to 13. Croke, K. B. and C. P. 1, 23. Davis, K. B., C. P. and Ex., 2 to 9. Glanville, election before committee of H. C., 21, 22. Godbolt, K. B., &c., 1 to 23. Hobert, K. B., &c., 1 to 23. Hutton, C. P., 10 to 23. Jenkins, Ex., 1 to 21. Jones (W.) K. B. and C. P., 18 to 33. Lane, Ex., 3 to 9. Leonard, K. B., C. P. and Ex., 1 to 12. Ley, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Court of Wards, 6 to 23. Moore, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 18. Noy, K. B. and C. P. 1 to 23. Owen, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 12. Palmer, K. B., 17 to 23. Popham, K. B., C. P., and Chan., 15 to 23. Reports in Chancery, 13. Rolle, K. B., 12 to22. Tothill, Chan., 1 to 23. Winch, C. P., 19 to 23. Yelverton, K. B., 1 to 10.
Charles I. - Mar. 27, 1625. Jan. 30, 1649. Aleyn, K. B., 22 to 24. Benloe, K. B., C. P. and Ex., 1 to 3. Bulstrode, K. B., 1 to 14. Clayton, Pleas of As. York, 7 to 24. Croke, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 16 Godbolt, K. B., &c., 1 to 13. Hetley, C. P., 3 to 7. Hutton, C. P.. 1 to 14. Jones, (W.) K. B. and C. P., 1 to 16. Latch, K. B., 1 to 3. Ley, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Court of Wards, 1 to 4. Littleton, C. P. and Ex., 2 to 7. March, K. B. and C. P., 15 to 18. Nelson, Chan., 1 to 24. Noy, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 24. Palmer, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 4. Popham, K.,B., C. P. and Chan., 1, 2. Reports in Chancery, 1 to 24. Style, K. B., 21 to 24. Tothill, Chan., I to 21.
Charles II. May 29, 1660. Feb. 6, 1685. Bridgman, C. P., 1 to 8. Carter, C. P., 16 to 27. Cases in Chancery, part 1-12 to 30. Cases in Chancery, part 2-26 to 37. Most of these cases in 2 C. C. are grossly misreported, said per Lord Loughborough,* 1 H. Bl. 332 Cayton, Pleas of As. York, 1, 2. Dickens, Chan., a few cases. Finch, Chan., 25 to 32. Freeman, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 22 to 37. Hardres, Ex., 7 to 21. Jones (Tho.) K. B. and C. P., 19 to 37 Krebi K. B., 13 to 30. Kelyng (Sir J.) Crown Cades and in K. B., 14 to 20. Levinz, X. B. and C. P., 12 to 37 Lutwyche, C. P., 34 to 37. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vols. 1, 2 - 1 to 29. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Cban., vol. 2 - 26 to 30. Modern, K. C., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 3 - 34 to 37. Nelson, Chan., 1 to 37. Parker, Ex., 30. Pollexfen, K. B., C. P. and Chan., 22 to 37. Raymond, (T.) K. B., C. P. and Ex., 12 to 35. Reports in Chancery, 1 to 37. Saunders, k. B., 18 to 24. Select Cases in Chancery, 33. Shower, K. B., 30 to 37. Siderlin, K. Ii., C. P. and Ex., 9 to 22. Skinner, K. B., 33 to 37. Style, K. B., I to 7. Vaughan, C. P., 17 to 25. Ventris, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 20 to 37. Vernon, Chan., 32 to 37,
James II. Feb. 6, 1685. Feb. 13, 1689. Carthew, K. B., 2 to 4. N Cases in Chancery, part 2 - 1 to 3. Cases of Settlement, K. B., 2 to 4. Comberbach, K. B., 1 to 4. Comberbach is said, by Lord Thurlow, to be bad authority. 1 Bro. C. C. 97. Freeman, K. B., C. P., Ex. lind Chan., 1 to 4. Levinz, K. B. and C. P., 1, 2. Lutwyche, C. P. 1 to 4. N Modern, K B., C. P. and Chan. vol. 3 - 1 to 4. Parker, Ex., 3, 4. Reports in Chancery, 1 to 3. Shower, K. B., 1 to 4. Skinner, K. B., 1 to 4. Ventris, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 4. Vernon, Ch., 1 to 4.
William III. & Mary. Feb. 13, 1682. Mar. 8, 1702. Carthew, K. B., 1 to 12. Cases concerning Settlements, X. B., 1 to 14. Colles, Parliamentary Cases, 9 to 14. Comberbach, K. B., 1 to 10. Comyns, K. B., C. P., Ex. Chan. and before the Delegates, 7 to 14. Fortescue, K: B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 7 to 14. Freeman, K B., C. P., I Ex. and Chan., 1 to 14. Kelyng, (Sir J.) Crown Canes, and in K. B., 8 to 13. Levinz, K. B. and C. P., 1 to 18. Lutwyche, C. P., I to 14. Modern, K. B,., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 3 - 1, 2. Modern, K. B., C. P., Fx- and Chan., vol. 4 - 3 to 7. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex- and Chan., vol. 5 - 5 to 11. Modern, K. B., C. 'P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 12 - 2 to 14. Parker, Ex., 4 to 13. Peere Williams, Chan. and K. B., 7 to 14. Precedents in Chancery, 1 to 4. Raymond, (Lord) K. B. and C. P., 4 to 14. Reports in Chancery, vol. 2-5. Reports temp. Holt, K. B., C. P.,Ex. and Chan., 1 to 14. Salkeld, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chair., 1 to 14. Select Cases in Chancery, 5,,9. Shower, K. B., 1 to 6. Skinner, K. B , I to 9. Ventris, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1, 2. Vernon, Chan., 1 to 14.
Anne. Mar. 8, 1702. dug. 1, 1714, Brown's Parliamentary Cases, 1 to 1.3. Banbury, Ex., 12, 13. Cases concerning Settlements, K. B., 1 to 13. Cases on Practice, C. P., 5 to 13. Colles, Parliamentary Cases, 1 to 8. Comyns, K. B., C. P., Ex. Chanc. and before the Delegates, 1 to 13. Dickens, Chan., a few cases. Fortesque, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 13. Freeman, K. J3., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 5. Gilbert's Cases in Law an Equity, 12, 13. Gilbert, K. B.,.Chan. and Ex., 4 to 43. Relyng, (Sir J.) Crown Cases, and in K. B. Lutwyche, C. P., 1, 2. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 6 - 2, 3. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 7 - 1. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 10 - 8 to 13. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., vol. 11 - 4 to 8. Parker, Ex., 6 to 12. Peere Williams, Chan. and K. B., 1 to 13. Practical Register, C. P.) 3 to 13. Precedents in Chancery, 1 to 13. Raymond, (Lord) K. B. and C. P., 1 to 13. Reports in Chancery, 4 to 8. Reports temp. Holt, 1 to 9. Robertson's App. Cases, 5 to 13. Salkeld, K.,B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 10. Session Cases, K. B., 9 to 13 Vernon, Chan., 1 to 13.
George I. Aug. 1, 1714. June 11, 1727. Barnardiston, K. B., 12, 13. This book is said to be "not of much authority;" Dougl. 333, n.; "of still less authority than 10 Mod.;" Dougl. 669, n; "a bad reporter." 1, East, 642, n. Brown's Parliamentary Cases, 1 to 13. Bunbury, Ex., 1 to 13. Mr. Bunbury never meant that those cases should be published; they are very loose notes. 5 Burr. 2568. Cases concerning Settlements, K. B., 1 to 13. Cases of Practice, C. P., 1 to 13. Comyns, K. B., C. P., Ex. Chanc. and before the Delegates, 1 to 13. Dickens, Chan., 1 to 13. Fortescue, K.@ B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 13. Gilbert, K. B., Chan. and Ex., 1 to 12. Modern, K. B., C. P., Ex.,and Chan., vols. 8 and 9 - 8 to 12. Modern, K. B., C. P.,. Ex., and Chan., vol. 10 - 1 to 11. Mosely' Chan., 12, 13. Parker, Ex., 4 to 13. Peere Williams, Chan. and K. B., 1 to 13. Practical Register, C. P., 1 to 13. Precedents in Chancery, 1 to 8. Raymond (Lord) K. B. and C. P., 1 and 10 to 13. Robertson's Appeal Cases, 1 to 13. Select Cases in Chan., 10 to 12. Sessions Cases, K. B., 1 to 13. Strange, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 2 to 13. Vernon, Chan. 1 to 5.
George II. June 11, 1727. Oct. 25, 1760. Ambler, Chap. and Ex. 11 to 34. Andrews, K. B., 11, 12. Atkyn's Chan., 9 to 27. Barnardiston, C. B., 1 to 7. Barnardiston, Chan., 13, 14. Barnes, C. P., 5 to 34. Belt's Supplement to Vesey, Chan., 20 to 28. Blackstone (Wm.) K. B. and C. P., 20 to 24, and 30 to 34. These reports are said not to be very accurate, per Lord Mansfield, Doug. 92, n. Brown's Parl. Cases, 1 to 34. Bunbury, Ex., 1 to 14. Burrow's K. B., 30 to 34. Burrow's Settlement Cases, K. B., 5 to 34. Cases of Settlement, K. B., 1 to 5. Cases of Practice, K. P., 1 to 20. Cases temp. Talbot, Chan. K. B., C. P., 7, 10. Comyns, Ex., Chan. and before the Delegates, 1 to 13. Cunningham, K. B., 7, 8. Dickens, Chan., 1 to 34. Mr. Dickens was a very attentive and diligent register; but his notes being rather loose, are not to be considered as of very high authority, per Lord Redesdale, 1 Sch. & Lef. 240. Vide also Sug. Vend. 146. Eden, Chan., 30 to 34. Fitzgibbon, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 5. Fortescue, 1 to 10. Foster, Crown Cases, 16 to 34. Kelynge, (W.) K. B.; C. P. and Chan., 1 to 8. Konyon, K. B., &c., 26 to 30., Leach, Crown Cases, 4 to 34. Lee, (Sir Geo.) Ecclesiastical, 25 to 32. Moseley, Chan., 1 to 3. Parker, Fx , 16 to 34. Peere Williams, Chan. and K. B., 1 to 8. Practical Register, C. P., I to 15. Raymond, (Lord) K. B. and C. P., 1 to 6. Reports temp. Hardwicke, K. B., 7, 10. Robertson's Appeal Cases, a few. Sayer, K. B., 25 to 29. Select Cases in Chancery, 6. Sessions Cases, K. B., 1 to 20. Strange, K. B., C. P., Ex. and Chan., 1 to 21. Vesey, (sen.) Chan., 20 to 28. Willes, C. P., Exch., Chan. and House of Lords. 11 to 32. Wilson, K. B., C. P., 16 to 34.
George III. Oct. 25, 1762. Jan. 29, 1820. Acton, Appeal Cases, 49, 50. Ambler, Chan. and Ex., 1 to 24. Anstruther, Ex., 32 to 37. Ball and Beatty, Irish Chan., 47 to 54. Barnewell and Alderson, K. B., 58 to 60. Blackstone, (Sir W.) K. B. and C.,P., 1 to 20. Blackstone, (H.) C. P. and Ex. Chamb., 28 to 36. Bligh, Appeal Cases, 59, 60. Bosanquet and Puller, C. P., and Exch. Chamb., to 47. Bott, Settlement Cases, 1 to 60. Broderip and Bingham, C. P., 59, 60. Brown, Chancery, 18 to 34. Brown, Parl. Cases, 1 to 40. Buck, Bankruptcy, 57 to 60. Burrow, K. B., 1 to 12. Burrow, Settlement Cases, K. B., 1 to 16. Caldecot, Settlement Cases, K. B., 17 to 26. Campbell, Nisi Prius, K. B., C. P., and Home Circuit, 48 to 56. Cases of Practice, K. B., 1 to 14. Chitty, K. B., 47 to 60. Cooper, Chan., 55. Corbet and Daniel, Election Cases. Cowper, K. B., 14 to 18. Cox, Chan., 23 to 36. Daniell, Ex., 57 to 60. Dickens, Chan., I to 38. Dodson, Admiralty, 51 to 57. Douglas, K. B., 19 to 25. Dow, H. of Lords, 53 to 58. Durnford and East, K. B., 26 to 40. East, K. B., 41 to 52. Edwards, Admiralty, 48, 49. Eden, Cban., 1 to 7. Espinasse, Nisi Prius, K. B., C. P. and Home Circuit, 33 to 47. Forrest, Ex., 41@ Fraser, Elec., H. Com. 32. Gow, Nisi Prius, C. P., 59, 60. Haggard, Consistory Court, 29 to 60. Holi, Nisi Prius, C. P. and North Circuit, 55 to 18. Jacob & Walker, Chan., 60. Kenyon, K. B., &c. Leach's Crown Cases, 1 to 55. Lofft, K. B., C. P. and Chan., 12 to 14. Luders, Election Cases, 25 to 30. Mariott, Admiralty, 16 to 19. Marshall, C. P., 54 to 57. Maddock, Vice Chan., 55 to 60. Maule & Selwyn,, K. B., 53 to 57 Merivate, Chan., 57 to 58. Moore, C. P., 57 to 60. Nolan, K. B., 32 to 34. Parker, Ex., 1 to 7. Peake, Nisi Prius, K. B., 30 to 35. Peckwell, Election Cases, 45,46. Phillimore, Ecclesiastical, 49 to 60. Price, Ex., 54 to 60. Robinson, Admiralty, 39 to 48. Rose, Bankruptcy 50 to 56. Russell & Ryan, Crown Cases, 39, &c. Schoales & Lefroy, Irish Chan., 42 to 44. Smith, K. B. and Chan., 44 to 46. Starkie, Nisi Prius, K. B., C. P. and North Cir., 5 to 60. Swanston, Chan., 58 to 60. Taunton, C. P., 48 to 58. Vesey, jun., Chan., 29 to 52. Vesey & Beames, dhan., 52 to 54. Wightwick, Ex., 50, 51. Wilson, K. B. and C. .P., 1 to 14. Wilson, Chan., 58 to 60. Wilson; Ex., 57.
George IV. Jan. 29, 1820, June 26, 1830. Addams, Eccl. 2 to 6. Barnwell & Alderson, K. B., 1 to 3. Barnewall & Cresswell, K. B., 3 to 10. Adolphus, K. B., 10, &c. Batty, K. B., (Ireland) 5 & 6. Beitty, Chan., (do.) 7 & 8. Bingham, C. P., 3, &c. Bligh, H. of Lords, 1, &c. Bott, Settlement Cases, 1 to 7. Broderip & Bingham, C. P., 1 to 3. Carrington & Payne, N. P., 4, &c. Chitty, K. B., 1 to 3. Cresswell, Insolvent, 7 to 9. Daniell, Exchequer. Danson & Lloyd, Mercantile Cases, 8, 9. Dowling & Ryland, 2 to 7. Fox & Smith, K. B., (Ireland) 3 to 5. Glyn & Jameson, Bankruptcy. Haggard, Eccles. 7 to 10. Hogan, Rolls, (rreland) 6 & 7. Hudson & Brooke, K. B., (Ireland) 7 to 11. Jacob & Walker, Chan., 1, 2. Jacob, Chan., 2, 3. Lloyd & Welshy, Mercantile Cases, 10, &c. Maddock, Vice-Chan., I to 3. Manning & Ryland, K. B., 7 to 9. Molloy, Chan., (Ireland) 7 to 11. Moody & Malkin, N. P., 7, &c. Moore, C. P., 1 to 7. Moore & Payne, C. P., 7, &c. Phillimore, Eccles., 1, 2. Price, Exchequer, 1, &c. Russell & Ryan, Cro. Cases, 1 to 3. Russell, Chan., 6 &c. Russell & Mylne, 9, &c. Ryan & Moody, N. P., 4 to 7. Ryan & Moody, Cro. Cases, 4 to 10. Simon & Stuart, Vice-Chan., 2 to 7. Simons, Vice-Chan., 7 &c. Smith & Batty, K B., (Ireland) 4, & 5 Starke, N. P., 1 &c. Turner, Chan., 3, &c. Younge & Jervis, Ex., 7, &c. Younge, Ex. Eq., 11, &C.
William IV. June 26, 1830. June 20, 1837. Adolphus & Ellis, K. B., 4 to Barnewell & Adolphus, X. B., 1 to 3. Bingham, C. P., 1 to Bligh, H. of Lords, 1 to Carrington & Payne' N. P., 1 to Clark & Finnelli, 2 to Cockburn & Rowe, 3. Crompton & Jervis, Exch., 1 & 2, Crompton & Meeson, Exch., 3 & 4, Crompton, Meeson & Roscoe, Ech., 4 to 6. Curteis, 5 to Deacon & Chitty, Bankruptcy, 2 to 5. Deacon, Bankruptcy, 6 to Dow & Clarke, H. of Lords, 1 to Dowling, Practice, Cases, 1 to Haggard, Ecclesiastical, 1 to Haggard, Admiralty, 1 to Hayes, Exch., (Ireland) 1 to 3. Knapp, Appeal Cases, 1 to Knapp & Ombler, Election Cases, 5 to Lloyd & Goold, Irish Chan., 5 to Manning & Ryland, K. B., 1 to Meeson & Welshy, 6. Montagu & Bligh, Bankruptcy, 2 & 3. Montagu & Ayrton, Bankruptch, 3 to Moody & Malkin, N. P., 1 to Moore & Payne, C. P., 1 to Moore & Scott, C. P., 1 to Mylne & Craig. Mylne & Keen, Chan., 3 to Neville & Manning, K. B., 3 Perry & Knapp, election Cases, 3 to 5. Russell & Mylne, Chan., 1 to 3. Scott, C. P., 5 tyo Simons, Vice-Chan. 1 to Tamlyn, Rolls, 1 to Tyrwhitt, Exch., 1 to Tyrwhitt & Granger. Wilson & Shaw. H. of Lords, 1 to Wilson & Courtenay, H. of Lords, 2 to Younge, Equity Exch., 1 to Younge & Collyer, Equity Exch., 4,to
Victoria. June 20, 1837. Adolphus & Ellis, K. B. Adolphus & Ellis, New Series. Alcock & Napier, K. B., (Ireland) Alcock's REgistry Cases. Armstrong & Mercartney, N. P. (Ireland) Baron & Austin, Election Cases. Baron & Arnold, Election Cases. Beavan, Rolls Court. Bells, Appeal Cases to H. of L., (Ireland) Bell, Murray, Young & Tennent, Session Cases, (Ireland) Brown, High Court of Justiciary, (Ireland.) Bingham, C. P., 1 to Bligh, House of Lords. Bligh, New Series. Carrington & Kirwan, N. P. Carrington & Marshman, N. P., C. P. and Exch. Carrington & Payne, N. P., Q. P., C. P. Exch. Carrow, Hammerton & Allen, Magistrates' Cases., Clark & Finnelly, H. of Lords. Collyer, Chancery. Connor & Lawson, Chancery, (Ireland.) Cooper, Chancery Practice Caset. Cooper tempore Brougham, Chancery. Craig & Phillips, Chancery. Crawford & Dix, Abridged Cases in all the Courts, (Ireland.) Crawford & Dix, Circuit Cases, (Ireland) Curtis, Ecclesiastical. Davison & Manning, Q. B. Deacon, Bankruptcy. Denison, Crown Cases, reserved. De Gex & Smales, Chancery. Dow & Clark, H. of L. Dowling & Lowndes, Points of Practice. Dowling, Practice Cases Dowling, New Series. Drury & Walsh, Chancery, (Ireland) Drury & Warren, Chancery, (Ireland) Dunlap, Bell, Murray, Sessions Cases, (Ireland) Dunlap, BeIl, Murray & Donaldson, Sessions cases, (Ireland.) Exchequer Reports, by Welshy, Hurstone & Gordon. Falconer & Fitzherbert, Election. Flanagan & Kelle, Rolls, (Ireland.) Gale & Davison, K. B. Haggard, Admiralty, Hare, Chancery. Jebb & Bourke, Q. B., (Ireland.) Jebb & Symes, K. B., (Ireland.) Jones & Latouche, Q. B., (Ireland.) Jones Exchequer, (Ireland.) Jones & Carey, Exchequer, (Ireland.) Keen, Rolls. Law Recorder, in all the Courts, (Ireland.) Longfield & Townsend, Exch., (Ireland.) McLean & Robinson, H. of L (Ireland.) Manning & Granger, C. P. Manning, Granger & Scott, C. P. Meeson & Welshy, Exch. Montagu & Ayrton, Bankruptcy. Montagu & Chitty, Bankruptcy. Montagu, Deacon & De Gex, Bankruptcy. Montagu & Neale, Election. Moody, N. P. and Crown Cases. Moodv & Robinson, Nisi Prius. Moore, Appeal Cases. Moore, East India Appeals. Moore, Privy Council. Mylne & Craig, Chancery. Neville & Perry, K. B. Perry & Davidson, K. B., Phillips, Chancery. Robinson, Admiralty. Robinson, House of Lords. Sausse & Scully, Rolls, (Ireland.) Scott, C. P. Scott, New Series. Shaw & Maclean, House of Lords. Smyth; C. P., (Ireland.) Simons, Vice-Chancellor. Welsh, Registry Cases, (Ireland.) West, Parl. Reports. Younge & Collyer, Equity Ex.